Amerika

Sea change happens from the details, and only later do people give it a name and conclude it was an event. Natural systems respond this way; instead of centralized control, they react to consistency of change and adapt, which means you rarely see it coming.

Yesterday, Ann Coulter fired one of the most important shots in the culture war, which includes the preservation of heritage, family, culture, and civilization. She wrote a piece provocatively entitled “Why You No Longer Recognize Your Country,” designed to wake up the basement armchair conservatives to the reality that we face:

Answer: immigration. When Reagan was elected governor of California, the state was 77% white. Today, whites are a minority at 37%.

You wonder why Democrats are always crowing about how the “blacks and the browns” are voting for them? Another way of putting it is: White voters are the only ones who will ever, in a million years, give a majority of their votes to a Republican.

But the immigration of vast numbers of non-whites from dysfunctional cultures is just a “single issue.”

The whole thing is worth reading, but she makes the same point that “The Flight 93 Election” did, which is that we are about to have a permanent third world majority which will only vote Leftist, making America a one-party state like most of the third world:

To simultaneously hold conservative cultural, economic, and political beliefs—to insist that our liberal-left present reality and future direction is incompatible with human nature and must undermine society—and yet also believe that things can go on more or less the way they are going, ideally but not necessarily with some conservative tinkering here and there, is logically impossible.

The whole enterprise of Conservatism, Inc., reeks of failure. Its sole recent and ongoing success is its own self-preservation. Conservative intellectuals never tire of praising “entrepreneurs” and “creative destruction.” Dare to fail! they exhort businessmen. Let the market decide! Except, um, not with respect to us. Or is their true market not the political arena, but the fundraising circuit?

[T]he ceaseless importation of Third World foreigners with no tradition of, taste for, or experience in liberty means that the electorate grows more left, more Democratic, less Republican, less republican, and less traditionally American with every cycle. As does, of course, the U.S. population, which only serves to reinforce the two other causes outlined above. This is the core reason why the Left, the Democrats, and the bipartisan junta (categories distinct but very much overlapping) think they are on the cusp of a permanent victory that will forever obviate the need to pretend to respect democratic and constitutional niceties. Because they are.

The writer still indulges in the “magic dirt” mythos enough to avoid being censored, mainly by talking about the “tradition…of liberty” instead of the obvious, which is that some genetic component is required to create Western Civilization, namely that of being an ethnic Western European.

We might be able to teach our System to others, or even our political values, but we cannot teach them to be us, and any attempts to do so are covert attempts to displace and replace our people with a population that is genetically inclined toward permanent Left-wing voting and other third world behaviors.

In the third world, every political campaign looks like the Obama years, with promises of revolution and change and sticking it to the rich, but then it turns out that to the surprise of everyone, rich and powerful people funded the opposition candidate. The uniparty wins again.

To a world-experienced cynic, the third world remains the third world for two reasons: first, the massive corruption of its political systems and, second, that the overwhelming majority of its people are too low-IQ to stop voting for hoper-changers and start voting for function.

You can bribe people under 100 IQ points with the promise of free stuff, and by the time the next election comes around, they will have forgotten what was said in the last round of promises, so they fall for it again.

If you ever wonder why big corporations, small businesses, and big government agree that more warm stupid bodies are a good thing, look at their business model. A discerning clientele requires quality; an idiotic clientele likes low prices and novelty.

Once upon a time, I bought a pair of sneakers by a leading brand. These were different from my normal nerd sneakers, using a brand favored in some athletic circles, but were considerably more hip. They fell apart in a few months, but looked really swift the whole time.

When I look at the average wearer of these sneakers these days, they are “new Americans”: not WASP, and usually not even White, and they own many pairs of sneakers that they use casually for basketball or light jogging. In other words, they spend a lot more on sneaker than WASPs do.

Old America had a clear values system: utility, efficiency, and quality. We did not own many pairs of sneakers, and valued tough sneakers that did not harm our bodies by having lazy support or bad grip. We wanted to get in there every year or two, buy a pair, and then spent our time thinking about more pleasant and interesting things.

New America shops compulsively, much like people in the third world, because when there is money, it should be spent. The government will take care of retirement, and medical, and schooling, and probably free school lunches, so go ahead and buy that iPhone, those fancy kicks, or tickets to that hip show.

Old America was based on quality over quantity; new America, like the third world, is based on quantity alone, or having more warm clueless bodies compulsively buying stuff so that everyone can get rich, even as it takes increasingly huge amounts of money to live a normal, decent life.

This is what I called “thirdworlding” some years ago. Communism is just one example of it; another is, well, any third world state with its mishmash of market socialism, rampant capitalism, and a public democracy that is in private all decided in boardrooms and clubs.

In these societies, you find a small elite ruling over the rest and manipulating them because the rest are clueless, and that small elite rules for its own comfort and stability, a process known as tyranny. In America, the DNC, Big Tech, and unions want to be that new elite.

The third world and tyranny are roughly the same thing. Only dumb populations select transparently manipulative leaders, but those leaders will disguise their actual intent until they have the dumb population that they want. Then, the rest will dumb down or die off.

With that out in the open, we can now look at the historical sea change which is coming upon us. The twentieth century became defined by the fall of the West, decolonization, democratization, liberalization, and standardization (globalism) worldwide.

Everyone fell into line with the New World Order, which seemed to be liberal democracy, market socialism, rampant international capitalism, and political correctness. Basically: what shopkeepers worldwide want, which is people forced to be nice to each other so everyone can keep buying stuff.

This divides the West into two groups, those who want to go along with the New World Order and those who do not, with most conservatives and some moderates in the “keep the old way” camp, and most Leftists, libertarians, neoconservatives, poor, minorities, homosexuals, transsexuals, neurotics, criminals, metrosexuals, boxwine thots, baristas, soyboys, Catholics, and near-Whites (Southern, Irish, Mediterranean, and Eastern Europeans) enthusiastic for the NWO.

Coulter and Anton just revealed the central issue at the core of the NWO, which is the obliteration of culture through the importation of foreigners, and the need to import third-world people into the West so that they will always vote Leftist, throwing the balance of power to the Left.

White Nationalism (1945-2015) saw this coming through an entirely racial lens, since that is how traditionalists tend to think, and pointed out that population replacement was occurring way back when America was not just 90% White but mostly ethnic Western European.

At this point, half of the country identifies with being not-the-majority, and these are either non-Whites or near-Whites as well as the permanently unhappy people who make up the Left. The permanently unhappy just want a scapegoat for their misery, not realizing that it is the result of their own decisions.

However, White Nationalism 1.0 packed on all sorts of baggage that most people do not want, like a zeal for the excesses of National Socialism as portrayed by Hollywood. It was as if they took the slanders of their enemies and decided to own them.

It also carried with it too many Leftist ideas, just like national socialism did. To recap, conservatism means order through a look at history and a qualitative assessment of how to achieve excellence (arete). Leftism is egalitarianism, including “Leftism lite” like libertarians (“muh equality of opportunity”).

Ironically, some of the impetus to get back to the real Right came from the Libertarians, culminating in the Tea Party and Neoreaction. The Tea Party recognized that entitlements had bankrupted America; Neoreaction saw that if people could choose their government like they choose other services, no one would buy what the modern West is selling.

Both of these movements served an entirely transitional role: the Tea Party targeted market socialism, or the tax-and-spend wealth redistribution systems grafted onto the free markets by modern governments, and Neoreaction targeted the psychology of democracy, following the general outline from Ted Kaczynski.

If Neoreaction had a defining moment, it was Mencius Moldbug writing that he was not a White Nationalist, but he thought they might… just might… have a point. Some years before, I had been writing that I blamed diversity because it was inherently unstable, not any specific ethnic groups.

The underground dissident Right sort of mashed all of this together and came up with a compromise, namely the Alt-Right. Following the ideas of paleoconservative Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer, the Alt-Right brought in both Tea Party and Nationalist ideas: diversity fails, internationalism is toxic, our current conservatives are agents of the System, and we need a real, authentic conservatism.

There it stalled, mainly because most of the Alt-Right — like the National Socialists before them — made the mistake of wanting a hybrid system with both elements of Left and Right, not realizing that when you dip a toe in egalitarianism, it will pull you under and you will be on the path to inevitable Full Communism eventually.

At that point, the Alt-Right fell apart, mostly because of attacks from both within and without. Its internal division splintered it into libertarian-style groups and National Socialist style groups, with neither appealing to the whole of the audience. Demonization in the media and lawsuits did the rest.

However, it lives on with Coulter, Malkin, Anton, and others finally willing to talk about the National Question, mainly how the Left has brought in with the Hart-Celler Act and subsequent activity a permanent third-world voting bloc to obliterate the founding majority.

Our country has been stolen from us through entirely legal (the term “legitimate” is up for some question) methods of democracy. After all, whichever person seduces the most voters with promises wins the power, and then can do whatever they want, in a democracy.

At this point, we find ourselves facing cultural genocide:

At least nine Mongolians have lost their lives, and thousands have been arrested in protest of China’s latest cultural genocide campaign carried out in the name of “second generation bilingual education.”

Arbitrary arrest, extrajudicial detention, forced disappearance, and house arrest are so widespread that the Southern Mongolian Human Rights Information Center estimates at least 4,000 to 5,000 Mongolians have been placed under some form of police custody during the past three weeks. These individuals include prominent dissidents and their family members, writers, grassroots activists, herders leaders, recent protesters, and netizens.

Reports confirm that the Mongolian language is completely banned in schools. Students are banned from speaking Mongolian during any school activities. “Those students who were forcefully taken to school are now banned from speaking in Mongolian,” a parent from western Southern Mongolia’s Otog Banner said in an audio message. “We Mongolians must be alerted [to] the seriousness and magnitude of this move.”

Ironically, the System that Genghis Khan invented has come back to destroy his people. He was, after all, the first guy in the post-classical era to create a religiously/ethnically-tolerant centralized bureaucracy centered around the idea of using ideology (symbolic belief, not organic belief like racialism) to control people.

However, if you read Plato and Aristotle, you will see that his methods were known millennia before, and have been the method of tyrants since the dawn of humanity.

These methods are not hard to understand. If you want to rule a nation for your own convenience, you need to get rid of dissent, and the best way to do that is to squash any organic order and replace it with zombie-like people who obey whatever the newspapers say to do.

Political correctness was just the most recent iteration of this idea, namely that we could not discuss differences in race, sex, sexual orientation, body size, intelligence, and success; instead, we had to talk only about happy egalitarian things, like how equal everyone is, and how we are all one, and how each person is a star!

During the rise of Farage and Trump, we have seen conservatism re-assess its role in the postwar order, concluding that it was kept around only to protect the West from the truly incompetent Leftists (Communists) in order to replace them with a more pervasive, manipulative, camouflaged, and persistent variety.

If Communism is Ebola or AIDS, then postmodern Leftism in the West is the common cold: always there, always sapping our strength, and because it does not immediately kill us, always growing stronger. Maybe it is herpes, or chlamydia, or even the flu. We cannot seem to eradicate it because we have never tried.

With the recognition of the importance of race, conservatism has returned to its roots in the American Nativists, John Birch Society, and French New Right, bypassing the cucks (American New Right, Libertarians) and hybrids (National Socialism, Fascism).

This path will ultimately lead it to what we call the Ult Right or furthest Right, the essence of conservatism, which wants to re-start the civilization cycle with eternal tradition:

Societies have a life cycle just like humans. If you take care of your society, it can last for a really long time. If you do not, it self-destructs quickly. The remnants of destroyed societies are what we call third world nations. In each of these, there was once a prosperous society led by intelligent and noble people. These people pitied others, and so made life more hygienic, safer, abundant and easier for them, which resulted in incompetents outbreeding competents and dooming the society to failure.

During the early days of a civilization, there is no need for formalization. People recognize a shared purpose and set of values to achieve that purpose. It can be as simple as adaptation to a geographic area, but only if it includes an added dimension, which is the desire to not just survive but to thrive. Essentially, the best human value is laziness, because it causes us to want to improve our knowledge and self-organization such that we have more time to relax, ponder, create music, wage war, fall in love, etc. You know of Mazlow’s pyramid of needs; in my view, civilization begins in the upper parts of this pyramid where emotions and the need to use the mind like a weapon are found.

Unfortunately, over time, the aforementioned process of “helping others” leads to a proliferation of incapable people. These people do not mean badly, but they have a fatal flaw, which is that they are thoughtless. They will either overpopulate their geographical area or cause some other tragedy of the commons (an event where a public resource is exploited unto destruction because its cost to each individual is free) and as a result, will find themselves starving, diseased or in wars they can’t win. At that point they turn on their leaders, who are usually the people who had been trying to stop the decay and getting beaten back by the crowd of people who want to believe in what they wish were true, not what they can discern is true.

As a result, wishful thinking predominates up until the very end, where there is a sudden and conclusion confrontation with reality itself, and the civilization falls apart. It does not just explode, but all the levels of civilized behavior drop precipitously until it is corrupt, dishonest, whorelike, ugly, dirty, commerce-ridden, violent, and directionless. It is usually ruled by warlords or a military junta because such disorder requires authoritarian government to keep it in line.

During this process people attempt to enforce their wishful thinking because (a) they want to stay in denial about the collapse and (b) this enables them to control others and get ahead through manipulation. As a result, they invent the myth of inherency. These words we use to describe things are not just token symbols we exchange in their view, but are the actual names of things. Our religions are not interpretations of metaphysics, but the whole truth. Government and collective approval are the only legitimate ways to make decisions. Good is a certain list of things; bad is anything that opposes it. Soon we are living in a world of “inherent” symbols that are human-created and often either arbitrary or deliberately controlling.

This is the origin of modern control. Unlike ancient control, which was cooperation based on having a hierarchy, or a decent authoritarian state, which is essentially paternalistic pragmatism (a form of consequentialism — the idea that we measure our actions by their results, not their intent — that, unlike utilitarianism, is based on reality for society as a whole and not the approval of a majority of its members, a subjective…or should we say “wishful thinking”….measurement), modern control is individuals controlling one another to keep any of us from upsetting the fragile balance created by a civilization dedicated to equality. In practical terms, “equality” means pluralism or that there is no right/wrong except for what is proscribed by the dominant ideology which we see as giving us equality and thus “freedom.” To a modern person, freedom and equality mean the same thing, which is pluralism or no social standards, which is naturally extended to diversity/multiculturalism/internationalism (these terms mean the same thing) and approval of every underdog group that doesn’t violate social/political norms.

Neoreaction, the Alt-Right, and mainstream neoconservatism (“voluntaryist Christian libertarianism”) have become obsolete. The Right has rediscovered itself, with the questions of race and organic social hierarchy at the center, and this sets the stage for the twenty-first century conflict for the future of the human species.

With the fall of equality, which we are now recognizing is like diversity fatal in even small doses, we realize that humans are not equal, and therefore, we need the more competent to be in control, even in the world addressed by social conservatism, namely culture, religion, family, and good breeding.

With the fall of diversity, we are recognizing that the internationalism dream of one world market and one world government is disgusting and broken, and that we instead can only rely on ourselves — our own ethnic group — to represent its own interests. Nationalism rises, globalism falls.

Those who still want the twentieth century order, the NWO, find this appalling and are trying to stop us, but for once in the political correctness era, mass outrage is not following their accusations. Especially after three months of race riots and an unnecessary economic shut down for quarantine.

The future happens now, as it always does. The decisions we make in this moment determine our future. Do we want to survive as Western Civilization, or as mixed-ethnic people who are mostly “White” but foreign to what is necessary to create Western Civilization?

During the last thousand years, the previous lights of Western Civilization in Southern and Eastern Europe collapsed and were replaced by mixed-ethnic people who are mostly “White” but show trace admixture from Asia and Africa. These could not re-create Western Civilization.

Only the West now remains, and not surprisingly, the rest of the world wants to make us fail, because as long as we exist as an example of how to do things correctly, everyone else is going to feel bad about themselves. They could emulate us instead, but in the near-term, they will not.

Our path branches before us. Either we go further Right and save ourselves, or we become another dead civilization, perhaps better than others, but still not good. If we go Right, we can fix our human problems and take to the stars. Otherwise, the future will be something that you will not recognize, nor want to inhabit.

Tags: ann coulter, Globalism, mencius moldbug, national question, neoreaction, western civilization