Amerika

We live in an inverted time. Groups fear reality because they cannot control it, so they make sacred human emotional responses to it because from those, they can rationalize that they are in control because they can manipulate these semi-tangible emotional impulses. As a result, groups turn toward ironist contrarianism or reality-denial.

Part of this ironist contrarian reality-denial involves denial of biology and the natural inequality (“bell curve”) of all human traits, including the knowledge that traits are mostly heritable. The core of Crowdism is the idea that human groups deny the real and pursue the social and emotional.

Currently, your leaders want to turn Europe and the United States into South America, or a mixed-race mixed-ethnic society which is more Semitic — mostly Caucasian, some Asian, tiny bits of North African — in ethnic composition. This, they feel, will eliminate ethnic conflict, create equality and arrive at… Utopia!

The egalitarians feel that conflict occurs when one party has more than the others, so their solution is to redistribute wealth until everyone has the same baseline, with some having more (of course, of course) for being loyal servants of the Regime. They extend this notion to race itself, since some races are prosperous while others live in impoverished squalor.

They eventually extend this beyond social class, their original target, to sex, sexual orientation, intelligence, race, and finally, ethnic group. Races are the four root races — African, Asian, Australid, Caucasian — and ethnic groups are formed of these in whole (ethnic Western Europeans) or mixed parts (Italians, Indians, Ashkenazim, Russians).

Although the official propaganda tells us that diversity is a positive and our future as one big ethnically-mixed group will be a new era of peace and prosperity, reality tells us a different story: mixed-race and mixed-ethnic children are not as healthy as unmixed ones.

Even more, since genes code for traits and frameworks of traits provide the ability and tendencies of each group, mixing shatters those frameworks and the original abilities are lost over time, which is why most third-world nations seem to be mixed race as well as low average IQ and impoverished.

For starters, mixed-race babies have more health defects:

This study seeks to quantify and rank the contribution of selected factors to the observed racial/ethnic disparities in low-birth-weight births (LBWBs) and preterm births (PTBs).

The prevalence of PTBs was 9.1% among non-Hispanic White (NHW) women, as compared to 12.8% among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women and 10.6% among Hispanic women. The corresponding prevalence of LBWBs in the three groups were 5.9%, 11.9%, and 7.2%, respectively. The higher educational attainment among NHW women, relative to NHB women accounted for 10% of the observed difference in LBWB rate between the two groups. Health insurance coverage was the second most important factor accounting for the observed disparities in birth outcomes.

The Black-White hybrids seem to have unique problems:

The analysis included approximately 1.6 million live births and 1749 stillbirths. In the unadjusted model, compared with two white parents, black/black and black/white couples had a significantly higher risk of fetal death. When all demographic, social, biological, genetic, congenital, and procedural risk factors except gestational age and birth weight were included, the odds ratios (OR) were all still significant.

Especially when Black mothers give birth to mixed spawn:

In considering white or black parents, black couples demonstrated greater odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.3-2.5) than white couples. Compared with white couples, black-white couples had increased odds of preterm birth. In black-white couples, the odds of preterm birth were greater if the mother was black (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5-1.9) than if the father was black (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3).

These babies have health disorders at a higher rate than unmixed babies:

In multivariable analysis, controlling for maternal and paternal demographic characteristics and maternal clinical factors, paternal race and ethnicity remained significantly associated with the majority of the adverse pregnancy outcomes. The strongest association was seen with: (1) paternal non-Hispanic black race and ethnicity, and higher rates of LBW and preterm birth (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.24-1.27 and OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.13-1.15, respectively); (2) paternal Hispanic race and ethnicity and lower rates of 5-minute Apgar’s score <7, and assisted ventilation at >6 hours of life (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.77-0.79, and OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.75-0.78, respectively); and (3) other paternal race and ethnicity and higher rates of gestational diabetes, but lower rates of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and assisted ventilation >6 hours of life (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.25-1.27; OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.78-0.80; and OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.78-0.82, respectively). All associations were in comparison to paternal non-Hispanic white race and ethnicity.

Adverse birth outcomes rise with miscegenation:

By maternal race/ethnicity, infants of non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian women had risks of adverse birth outcomes between 10% and 210% greater than infants of non-Hispanic White women. Infants of non-Hispanic Black, Asian, and Hispanic couples exhibited higher risk of adverse birth outcomes than infants of non-Hispanic White couples. Moreover, parental racial/ethnic discordance was associated with an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes, with highest risks for pairings of Asian men with non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic women, and of Asian women with non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic men.

It seems that White mothers in mixed-race relationships have a hard time as well:

Although risks varied across parental race categories, stillbirth was associated with a higher-than-expected risk for interracial couples: mother white-father black, relative risk (RR) 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.26) and mother black-father white, RR 1.37 (95% CI 1.21-1.54) compared with mother white-father white parents. The RR for stillbirth was even higher among mother black-father black parents (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.62-1.72). The overall patterns of association for small for gestational age births (< 5th and < 10th percentile) and early neonatal mortality were similar to those seen for stillbirth.

Even more, being around foreign ethnics is associated with poor health outcomes:

We examined the associations of mother’s and parents’ race/ethnicity with low birth weight, small for gestational age, preterm birth and infant mortality among New York City women between 2012 and 2017. We also examined the independent and joint effects of neighborhood racial/ethnic composition. We found that mother’s and parents’ race/ethnicity are associated with adverse birth outcomes; these associations are outcome-specific; and neighborhood racial/ethnic composition is not only associated with such outcomes but also modifies the association of mother’s and parents’ race/ethnicity with these outcomes.

More on the mixed-race babies and the rate of prenatal care required:

In unadjusted analyses of women with high SES, the PTB rate at each gestational age cutoff was higher for women of ‘mixed’ NH white and black race, and highest for women who were NH black only compared to women who were NH white only. In regression models we further adjusted for women with insurance and prenatal care their entire pregnancy, maternal race was associated with higher odds of PTB at each GA cutoff, with the highest odds observed at <28 weeks. Finally, in further adjustement analysis including only the 1,934,912 women who received prenatal care in the first trimester, findings were similar. Rates of preterm birth at each gestational age cutoff remained highest for women who identified as non-Hispanic black, intermediate for women identifying as both non-Hispanic black and white race, and lowest for non-Hispanic white women at <37 weeks (9.9% vs. 6.1% vs. 5.5%, respectively; p<0.001), <34 weeks (3.5% vs. 1.5% vs. 1.1%, respectively; p<0.001), and <28 weeks' gestation (1.2% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.2%, respectively, p<0.001).

And the preterm problem caused by mixed-race relationships:

Six studies were included in the final review; five studies examined associations between paternal characteristics of Black fathers and preterm birth, finding significantly increased odds of preterm birth among births with Black fathers. Among births with non-Hispanic Black paternity, the odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were reduced or not significantly associated.

This cannot be explained by socioeconomic status, only race:

51 studies from 20 high-income and upper-middle-income countries, comprising 2 198 655 pregnancies, were eligible for inclusion in this IPD meta-analysis. Neonatal death was twice as likely in babies born to Black women than in babies born to White women (OR 2·00, 95% CI 1·44–2·78), as was stillbirth (2·16, 1·46–3·19), and babies born to Black women were at increased risk of preterm birth (1·65, 1·46–1·88) and being small for gestational age (1·39, 1·13–1·72). Babies of women categorised as Hispanic had a three-times increased risk of neonatal death (OR 3·34, 95% CI 2·77–4·02) than did those born to White women, and those born to south Asian women were at increased risk of preterm birth (OR 1·26, 95% CI 1·07–1·48) and being small for gestational age (1·61, 1·32–1·95). The effects of race and ethnicity on preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age babies did not vary across regions.

It turns out that mono-ethnic pairings turn out better for every race:

Biracial status of parents was associated with higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes than both White parents but lower than both Black parents, with maternal race having a greater influence than paternal race on pregnancy outcomes.

Preterm birth correlates with other health problems which is why mixed babies are not just at risk in birth, but will have more problems throughout their lives:

Non-Hispanic black paternal race is a risk factor for preterm birth and should be considered when evaluating maternal a priori risk of prematurity.

Ideology is symbology and emotion, but reality is a far-off land that can only be discovered through analytical and creative thought combined. It is alien to most people, and when ideology takes over, it becomes taboo as the society encourages the worst possible outcomes.

Tags: biology, frameworks, genetics, miscegenation, mixed-ethnic, mixed-race