~~~
Does anyone else feel that all the statistics are a bit dubious?
This year’s figures may have also been helped by the fact Nielsen has changed the way it counts people watching out of their own homes – for example with friends or family, or in bars.
So we are now counting everyone in the bar, or what? They wanted a high number for the same reason they like high poll numbers. They need it to seem as if the regime is popular, where really most of the people in the bar were not watching at all.
WW2 is officially over, Germany is re-arming, and social benefits are about to take a cut. Without socialism, how will we fund diversity?
Most of the world is broke and wants to come to the places with money in order before everything collapses. They will, once inside, work toward their ethnic ends not those of any other group.
Once you announce that laws will not be enforced, you are going to get more people breaking laws.
After years of pretending that pluralism leads to peace and not simply delayed war, Europe is back to ethnic conflict as a norm.
More calls for more free stuff because otherwise things might be unequal. And where does the money come from? We take more from the productive and give to the newcomers in the hopes that if we pile up enough people and a giant market, we can beat out everyone else. This “growth”-based system will not turn out well.
High-trust schools require less extreme discipline.
We handle the diversity with silk gloves because everyone is afraid of being called “racist.”
They say the quiet part out loud: discrimination against Whites is something that should be enforced by government.
Some have figured out that you either stop viewpoint discrimination or become a propaganda organ for whichever side styles itself as the biggest victim, since in egalitarian systems the victims always prevail because for us to have “equality” we must take from those who are succeeding and give to those who are not.
This is why we call it individualism; humans would rather save a human individual from negative consequences than fix systemic problems.
Mixed-race children of immigrants realize that “assimilation is a form of loss,” and form tighter bonds with their origin communities.
No, silly, he thinks NATO countries should pay for themselves instead of relying on the USA to hold it all together with wealth transfer from our citizens.
Spending Other People’s Money (OPM) is addictive. You want to avoid controversy and so you write the check then consider the problem solved. The optics are the only thing that can get you thrown out of power, so you manage the optics and pass the cost on to the future. These “growing calls” always come from people who write checks, not people who produce things with their hands, minds, or souls.
Racial resentment spreads as political favoritism becomes more obvious.
Neurotic academic discovers that teachers expect trouble from Black students, but as other data points out, Black students also get in more trouble. Stereotype bias or self-reinforcing cycle? My guess: Black students get in the least amount of trouble in all-Black schools in Black nations, where they can have self-esteem instead of being subjected to White rules and discipline. If I were Black, this stuff would piss me off too.
Westerners infected with individualism must meddle in order to feel in control. If you meddle, you will be presumed to be responsible for all results, including those you did not intend.
User-reported data in study which makes it clear that if you are pro-feminist you had better report good results seems to indicate feminists have lots of satisfying sex, according to the two thousand people that were asked to fill out little questionnaires.
Raise costs and your population dies out, at which point you need to import the diversity to keep things going.
Remember that double-slit experiment? Waves behave like particles when observed. People, too, become more concrete in their behaviors, and the researchers influence the subject as much as the subject influences them. Maybe leave remote tribes alone to discover their destinies.
Chalet decides that one ethnic group is a risk of theft and mess, so acts accordingly, outraging human rights law, but after October 7th, ethno-nationalism is back on the menu to protect Jews as well. Maybe equality is simply paradoxical.
The problem is diversity. More than one group trying to coexist equals chaos. Repatriate the Palestinians and end the diaspora by returning only Jews and all Jews to Israel, their homeland and point of origin.
Industrialized wealthy societies raise costs, which makes everyone use each other, at which point romantic relationships do not last and many end up alone.
India wants to write religion into law. This offends modern individualist human rights law, which favors the individual. In traditional societies, people were viewed as parts of cultures which were tied to an ethnic group and a religion.
People in close proximity infect each other with their microbiome. This works in mono-ethnic societies but becomes a health risk in polyethnic ones.
Human rights law is ready to fall. It holds that people have the right to live in homeless camps on someone else’s land. Sanity says that homeless camps are a benefit to no one.
Another diversity conflict gets spicy because people will not simply discuss remigration.
Jobs became so hateful that now people seek a work-life balance which keeps them in the office less. Instead of rewarding the good and prioritizing the actually productive, Europe seeks productivity based on following procedure and therefore needs more warm bodies to keep the circular Ponzi scheme afloat.
Another diversity conflict kicks off in an area that has been tense for a long time.
Government allowed migrants to work while on student visas, so not surprisingly the number of visas went up.
When people notice the failure of diversity, governments censor and repress them in order to maintain the illusion of legitimacy of rule.
It turns out that moralistic corporations are even worse than amoral ones and the moralism works against profitability, so now business is turning on the ESG trend.
Your tax dollars pay for this nonsense all the time. To other ethnic groups, Whites are a threat, which is why diversity is on fire across the West.
As usual, when the Right wins, the Left unites against them and ignores the collateral damage. Nothing matters but returning to a symbolic reality where everything is good and safe.
No reparations without remigration. The African people were stolen, sold, and brought here then discarded once society moved past slavery. This has not been kind to them over time.
This seems like an odd thing to be doing, unless it is for some form of artistic endeavor or weird porn film.
They come here for the free money and guaranteed jobs so that they can send cash back home. The more you give, the more of them you get.
Living in a White-oriented society is so stressful that minorities die younger, therefore need compensatory behaviors like teen pregnancy and avoiding social norms.
Cancel culture has created an inauthenticity crisis by filtering out anyone who does not endorse the dogma of failing diversity, which is why the leaders we get are the sociopaths instead of the authentic and critical-minded people.
Leftist economies are demand-side, which means that they increase the value of money by making it move faster, using “expansionary” policies as described in this article. That cryptic term means government subsidizes and expands every industry in order to increase the welfare state, then claims the money is more valuable because it is heavily in demand by speculators.
~~~
~~~
Tags: diversitywatch, news