The post-WW2 narrative held that we were good in the West because we were diverse and democratic; we were the anti-Hitler, doing the opposite of everything he did, and therefore we were so good that we could do anything we felt like doing because we had already proven that we were not Hitler, even a little bit.
In order to keep our political system intact, we embrace a bundle of notions derived from equality as a concept. These describe policies that have not yet failed catastrophically, but may not be succeeding either. This list of concepts is necessary for us to say that we are indeed not Hitler.
We all know on some level that if any member of this bundle loses the faith of the governed, the whole thing will unravel. If diversity fails, for example, the ball of yarn will unravel until equality itself — close to the center — also unravels. Then we might discover the core of contrarian individualism, and that would not do at all.
Previously, around here we referred to this bundle as D.E.D.S. for “democracy, equality, diversity, and socialism.” However, upon discovery of the contrarian nature of egalitarianism and altruism that seeks to isolate and alienate people to demoralize them, it makes sense to expand this definition.
Hence D.E.A.D.S. for “democracy, equality, atomization, diversity, and subsidies/socialism.” Socialism means workers own the means of production which means subsidies for existing, and atomization is the end result of the demoralization program, where people exist in a bourgeois bubble of self-interest that denies nature, culture, and the divine.
All of these come from the egalitarian bubble which occurs when people decide to ignore reality and focus on socializing. They do this so that they can do whatever they want, have someone else babysit, and benefit from someone else cleaning up and absorbing the cost.
In order to con other people into supporting this, they style it not as “absolute lack of accountability for me” but “near absolute lack of accountability” for everyone, and set up rules that they intend to break immediately. Their goal is to cheat on their own system.
Equality starts with the idea of equal representation before the law, a policy which victimizes those who mostly do good and empowers those who mostly do bad. If you go into a courtroom with a lifetime of good choices, you get the same “justice” as someone who mostly made bad choices, as if to penalize you for trying to do the right thing.
It rapidly becomes the idea that the individual can demand things from government in order to have his equality restored. If someone is poor, since he is presumed equal, it is assumed that some misfortune has befallen him to make him poor, not his alcoholism, low IQ, mental health problems, laziness, or simple lack of desire to work.
(This is not a rant in favor of jobs. Many things that need doing are not paid; many things that are paid do not need doing. Jobs reward procedure over achievement and therefore invent lots of false measurements to reward the loyal and obedient, sort of like how schools reward mindless memorization.)
D.E.A.D.S naturally arises from the same individualism that motivates egalitarian thinking generally. Egalitarians are individualists, meaning that they want the individual to be the highest goal. That requires pushing aside contradictory ideas like nature, natural order, culture, and the divine.
Instead you get many flavors of equality:
Wherever you see a civilization collapse, some form of D.E.A.D.S was adopted. Diversity has been a known friend of tyrants for over two millennia, democracy is widely understood to implode after two centuries, socialism always runs out of other people’s money, and equality produces ideological zombies.
Most of the failures of the Right in the postwar period involve failure to correctly identify the enemy. We do not fight people; we fight ideas. As long as people rely on these ideas, the regime will continue. When they start to doubt D.E.A.D.S., then the wheels of history turn again.
Tags: atomization, DEADS, democracy, diversity, entitlements, equality, socialism, subsidies