Amerika

Amerika engineered — and continues to design — a number of firsts on the Right, namely changes in thought from woo and panic to solid analytical positions. We were the first to point that racism was inferior to opposing diversity, that socialism makes our own people weak, that the Big Lie of equality corrupts all that it touches, and several other notions that are now widely accepted.

In this way, Amerika has been instrumental in “peering behind” the face value interpretation of Western politics and instead, looking at politics as pathologies and game theory style plays for power, money, and prestige. This enables us to see through ideology, which claims to be the only method of accomplishing certain things assumed to be good, but is always cover for both a power grab and an incompetent “progressive, enlightened” method that ends in third world levels of failure.

Do we need to mention the Soviet Union here, or how the French Revolution made its people starve and then zapped France from a superpower into a backwater, or even how every commune that has been tried — and there have been quite a few! — has ended in tears?

Let us review a few key points that Amerika had made which are slowly infiltrating the Right:

1. Diversity is our death. When more than one ethnic group exists in a nation-state, that society becomes dedicated to fighting for power among the ethnic groups, because each group can either be subject to the will of the other, or conquer the other. Since being powerless means doom, generally, every group fights every other, but they all join in to crush the majority, who is blissfully unaware that it is a majority because it produced the society in its own image, therefore never notices race, ethnicity, religion, customs, and the like. As the ethnic groups fight, they exhaust the society, and it collapses inward, emerging as a society of racially-mixed generic grey people some time later that stays at a perpetual third world level. Diversity is death; not even one drop can be tolerated.
2. It doesn’t matter which ethnic groups are involved. Diversity fails because the other groups are different, not because there is something wrong with them. Unlike bigots, who see where a group is weak and use that to attack it, anti-diversitarians recognize that any foreign group will throw a society into the death-cycle of diversity. It does not matter how nice, kind, gentle, friendly, well-intentioned, moral, or intelligent they are; diversity gives them a choice between self-preservation and self-destruction, and everyone sane choose self-preservation. This means that the presence of even one foreign person is a threat; it forces society to redefine itself away from its behaviors, norms, likes/dislikes, and standards, and toward permissive, vague, and open-ended pluralistic standards so that it can accept the foreigner. The nicer that foreigner is, the worse the damage, and worst of all is that no one intends it to be so.
3. Reward-after-performance only. Throughout human history, people have argued strongly for reward-before-performance systems like socialism and equality, but these effectively say that good and bad will both be rewarded, which since bad is easier to achieve than good, amounts to a subsidy and financial incentive for the bad. This creates an industry around bad performance, since this is now the most efficient option, and this competition uses market forces to rapidly convert society into a place of takers not makers. It may seem unkind to be capitalist, but in fact it preserves our people; socialist-style systems degrade the quality of any population.
4. Human social systems are deathtraps. Unless an intervening force appears, when in social groups, humans tend to aim for the compromise that they think the group will accept; this focuses on a lowest common denominator, which of course gets lower with each iteration. Humans can focus on the goal or on the social group and they always focus on the social group out of fear for what the group might do to them, so individuals offer up their allegiance to the group in exchange for a promise of not being attacked. This enables them to get away with whatever little scams they want to run because they are presumed to be “good” and in the good graces of the group, but it also causes the group to over time invert reality by actively opposing mention of any parts of reality that “offend” anyone in the group. Eventually, it has taken out anything but the happy parts, so outright evil stuff consists of only happy words and images, and things that require complex truths to understand become censored out entirely. This phenomenon of Crowdism destroys all human organizations, groups, and civilizations by driving them away from reality and into a self-confirming, self-referential social illusion. It does not matter whether the ultimate hammer strike comes from government, industry, or social upheaval; people in groups always select the same ideology, a cross between Communism and Libertarianism that we might call “anarchy with grocery stores,” with subsidies from “the rich” to make it minimally function.
5. We have three choices for goal. We can aim for the self, the group, or a transcendent goal. The self and the group turn out to be one and the same; people who are “me first” realize quickly that in a group context, “me first” gets found out and punished, so instead they create the idea that they are gift-giving equality to the whole group, which lets everyone be “me first” with impunity. This allows the manipulators to cheat, and in game theory, gives them an ideal position: they (1) fool everyone else into thinking they are good from an inassailable position, since anyone attacking them is presumed to be attacking their symbolic ideals like equality and anti-poverty; (2) drive everyone else toward doing things that are destructive to them, therefore lessening competition; and (3) conceal this manipulation from everyone by insisting that this “symbolic reality” formed of gestures and appearance is real, while the actual reality formed of cause-effect relationships over time is irrelevant. Every great human society goes out this way; the smarter the group, the more likely it is to discover this pathology early on and manipulate itself to death. Without people to refocus on a transcendent goal, people default to living for themselves and creating collective action in order to manipulate others into not attacking them, especially if they are doing something wrong, which is why sociopaths rule these societies. A transcendent goal consists of holistic idealistic realism, or a belief system based in realism that aims for an ideal state — the best possible existence — out of what is possible, based in a recognition that life despite being both good and bad ends up at a good state, namely existence itself, and therefore “transcends” or overcomes its scary parts.
6. Without hierarchy, illusions rule. There is only one sane way to order your society: figure out who your most competent are and place them in positions of authority at every level, such that you have a king at the top and the best plumber in charge of making plumbing-related decisions in every community. Humans naturally tend toward hierarchy but like the illusion that they have a choice in the matter because that enables the individual to indulge in the greatest pretense both that he is important, and that he may someday “win the lottery” and end up in power. Hierarchy extends to social hierarchy or ensuring that the higher-IQ, greater-morality people have control of all the money and the lower-IQ, lower-morality people have control over nothing. Without hierarchy, whatever is popular among the crowd rules, and crowds specialize in chasing novelty and irony instead of solid forward long-term thinking geared toward qualitative excellence.

These are heresies that few in our society will utter, type, or even admit to knowing. In a society which has already been taken over by the Crowd, like our own, being associated with these ideas can destroy your life.

While Crowdism starts the decay, diversity finishes it, as we can see from many historical examples including ancient Egypt:

According to ancient texts, roughly 3,600 years ago, an invading force, known as the Hyksos, seized northern Egypt from a series of incompetent pharaohs, banishing them to a small chunk of land in the south.

Analysing human remains from extensive burial sites in the ancient Hyksos capital – about 120 kilometres northeast of Cairo – the largest isotopic study of the region supports a different theory: that these new rulers were descended from various Asiatic populations who had been living in Egypt for generations.

Thus, the authors argue, the rise of Hyksos was not a foreign invasion; it was more like an immigrant uprising.

In other words, the Hyksos population already existed in Egypt but had no power. This means they were the diversity, or a group of laborers imported to do basic labor that the dominant majority no longer wanted to do.

More accurately, for the majority, these forms of labor no longer made enough income for them to survive in a complex society, or at least, they could survive a lot better by moving up. This social mobility is part of what kills society because it promotes peasants to administrators.

Ever wonder why the middle managers who were your bosses in high school were such bad leaders? They should be managing nothing more complex than turnip retrieval, but instead they gain bureaucratic power in a system based on “accountability,” or in other words, appearance.

The Hyksos were part of a typical migration of people from poor areas to richer ones, coming from Palestine:

The rise of the Hyksos kings in Egypt was made possible by an influx of immigrants from Palestine into Egypt beginning about the 18th century bce. The immigrants brought with them new technologies, including the horse and chariot, the compound bow, and improved metal weapons. Most of them settled in the eastern portion of the Nile Delta, where they achieved a dominant role in trade with western Asia. Archaeological excavations in that area have revealed a Canaanite-style temple, Palestinian-type burials (including horse burials), Palestinian types of pottery, quantities of their superior weapons, and a series of Minoan frescoes that demonstrate stylistic parallels to those of Knossos and Thera. The most-prominent settlement was Avaris (modern Tall al-Dabʿa), a fortified camp over the remains of a Middle Kingdom town in the northeastern delta. Their chief deity was the Egyptian storm and desert god, Seth, whom they identified with a Syrian storm god, Hadad.

The sequence of events that brought the Hyksos kings to power in Lower Egypt is not entirely clear. The 13th and 14th dynasties, which had existed concurrently in Lower Egypt, weakened and disappeared about the middle of the 17th century. Some scholars have suggested that a famine in the Delta region contributed to their decline and opened the way for the emergence of the Hyksos dynasty. From Avaris the Hyksos 15th dynasty ruled most of Lower Egypt and the Nile valley as far south as Cusae (near present-day Asyūṭ). The contemporaneous 16th-dynasty rulers—minor Hyksos kings who ruled in Upper Egypt simultaneously with those of the 15th dynasty—were probably vassals of the latter group.

As the original article continues:

“Instead, this research supports the theory that the Hyksos rulers were not from a unified place of origin, but Western Asiatics whose ancestors moved into Egypt during the Middle Kingdom, lived there for centuries, and then rose to rule the north of Egypt.”

“This is consistent with the supposition that, while the ruling class had Near Eastern origins, the Hyksos’ rise to power was not the result of an invasion, as popularly theorised, but an internal dominance and takeover of foreign elite,” the authors write.

After a century or so, the pharaohs took back ‘their’ land from the Hyksos for good, sending them elsewhere in search for other land – possibly inspiring the biblical story of Exodus.

In other words, this shows us the typical diversity arc: a society thrives, but then loses sight of its goals, so defaults to Enlightenment™-style individualism, at which point people no longer care about whether their society survives or not; it is every man for himself.

Consequently, they do what benefits them in the short term but damages the society, namely importing foreign voters and laborers. These bide their time until they have enough numbers to seize political control, which they do whenever something weakens the society, already exhausted by the endless infighting created by diversity.

In this way, no one gets what they want. The majority is replaced; the minority gains control but in the process makes the society into a third world level ruin and genetically erases the majority, replacing it with a mixed-ethnic generic gray race that has none of the abilities of the original.

The society will never rise again. It has exhausted its greatness, been conquered from within, and now no longer exists except in name. Clever humans, always thinking of the tools they can make instead of the goals that they must have, have self-defeated yet again.

Tags: diversity, egypt, heresies, hyksos